Pennie & Edmonds LLP (D) represented defendants in a trademark infringement case wherein P was aware of prior false affidavits submitted by the defendants to the court when the defendants were represented by different counsel. D in opposition to a motion filed further affidavits on behalf of their defendants. It too was proven false. The court sua sponte ordered a show cause hearing as to why Rule 11 sanctions should not be imposed. D contends that the standard for sua sponte imposition is one of subjective bad faith. The court imposed sanctions under an objective reasonableness standard. D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.