D, age 16, used an ax to kill his parents and a younger brother and younger sister. Experts agree that D had been depressed for a number of years, that he was experiencing severe depression at the time he committed the murders, and that his feeling that he was trapped in a family situation not to his liking somehow led him to the conclusion that the only remedy was to kill the parents. D killed the younger siblings not because he was angry with them but to spare them further pain. The issue was whether D is unamenable to treatment in the juvenile court system consistent with the public safety. One doctor said no way, and the second said D could be treated successfully in 2-1/2 years, and probably in considerably less time. Even that doctor acknowledged that many such depressed people fail in treatment and/or have recurrences after treatment. The district court concluded that D had produced substantial evidence of amenability to treatment in the juvenile court system consistent with the public safety. The court denied P's petition to try D as an adult. The court of appeals held that keeping D in the juvenile court system is inconsistent with the intent of the legislature expressed in those amendments and it, therefore, reversed the district court. D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.