In The Matter Of Ross

146 A.3d 1232 (2016)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

H and Danielle (W) were married on July 27, 2002, and had two children prior to their separation in 2011. W filed for divorce in December 2011, alleging both fault and irreconcilable differences as grounds for divorce. H cross-petitioned for divorce on fault-based grounds, due to W's alleged adultery. Eleven months after W filed for divorce, H began a sexual relationship with another woman. W filed a motion to dismiss, alleging recrimination by H. The trial court granted the motion. In 2015, the court entered a final decree of divorce citing irreconcilable differences as the cause of the marital breakdown. H appealed arguing in part that his infidelity, which occurred eleven months after the parties' separation, could not be used as a basis for the defense of recrimination.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.