The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

H and W were both 58 years of age at the time of trial and had been married for approximately 32 years. They have five children, and W while trained as a dietician, had not been gainfully employed during the marriage. H is a dentist, and the net profits in 1975 were $106,452.61. At trial, W presented expert testimony that the practice had goodwill value of between $30,000-$200,000. H produced a dentist who declared that he had never known of a dentist selling his practice and including a factor of goodwill amounting to more than a few dollars. The court refused to include goodwill as an asset subject to distribution. W appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.