The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D manufacturers electrical components such as relays and surge arrestors. D engaged P in April 1991 to solicit orders for its products in Northern Illinois and Eastern Wisconsin. D is a manufacturer’s representative, and its sales staff offers a menu of goods, achieving economies of scale for manufacturers too small to support a dedicated sales staff. By fall 1994, D's sales in P's territory exceeded $6 million annually, a tenfold increase since P's engagement. D decided to terminated P at the end of October 1994. D gave 42 days' notice; the parties' contract required only 30. D had to pay P a commission for all products, ordered before the terminal date, that were delivered in the next 90 days. P believes that it has not been paid enough for the work it did in boosting d's sales. IP sued D seeking commissions for all products delivered through 1999, plus $5 million in punitive damages. The case was dismissed, and P appealed. P acknowledges that D did not need good cause to bring their dealings to a close. In Illinois, a contract without a fixed term may be ended for any or no reason.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.