In 1936, the descendants of Henry Ink conveyed land to the city of Canton (D) to use only as a public park. A second deed was given in 1941 to correct the description of the land, but otherwise, the two deeds were substantially identical. A habendum clause stated that the land was for the use and purpose of a public park, but for no other use or purposes whatsoever. If the land failed to be used as a park, it would be forfeited and revert to the grantors, heirs, successors, and assigns. The state appropriated highway easements across the land, giving D $130,822 for its interest in the property. Ink (P), a descendant of the grantor, claimed that when the property was taken by eminent domain, it should revert to the grantor. The trial court and the court of appeals held that P had no interest in either the money or the remaining property. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.