The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P sued Ds alleging that D by force of their official positions systematically extorted from the employees of P 3% of their official income from 1917 to 1949 as a condition of their continued employment. It is alleged that Ds retained the monies for their own use and that Ds consisted of former city officials, two former mayors, and a deputy mayor. P wanted judgment of $15,000,000 plus interest for the benefit of all employees and their heirs. The trial court dismissed, and P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.