Jones (P) agreed under contract to provide Eastside (D) with a feasibility study, master plan, nine records surveys and nine short plats for a 180-acre parcel. That price was $17,480. The King County Building Association imposed a number of conditions upon D, and in order for D to meet those conditions, the contract with P was modified to include a price of $12,550 for various other requirements. P contends that it did all the work required under the original contract and the modified contract and was due all the monies under both contracts. D claimed that two conditions precedent to payment had not been completed. D paid P $15,000, and P sued D for the balance. The trial court awarded D its motion to dismiss in that obtaining county approval was a condition precedent to contractual payment and that condition had not been met. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.