This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

H and W were married. H was thirty years old at the time of trial and is an enrolled member of the Sisseton-Wahpeton Dakota Nation. W was twenty-five years old at the time of trial and is Caucasian. The parties have three children, Lyndra, Elias and Desiree. The family resided in a trailer house on the farm of H's parents. H is a minority shareholder in and works for Penrhos Farms. Penrhos is a close family farm corporation, owned primarily by H's father and his three uncles. W was a homemaker for a time and also held various jobs. She is currently enrolled in a nursing program at the Sisseton-Wahpeton Community College. H is a recovering alcoholic who, while drinking, exhibited a behavior of violence towards W and a somewhat casual indifference to the children. He has been sober since December 1992 and regularly attends and presents Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. W suffers from depression and low self-esteem but is seeking counseling at this time. Both parties were granted a divorce based upon mental cruelty. They were also granted joint legal custody of the children with primary physical custody being awarded to H. W got rehabilitative alimony to allow her to finish the nursing program. She was awarded the cost of two years tuition, $10,680.00, with a monthly payment of $445.00, to commence when she returns to school. The issue on appeal was whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding custody of the children to H; whether the trial court wrongfully considered race when determining the best interests of the children; and whether the trial court abused its discretion with the award of rehabilitative alimony.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.