The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Kabil (P) contacted Mignot (D) to engage them for helicopter services on a job that P contracted to perform for the United States Forest Service. D denied there was a contract and testified that their agent had not accepted the job offer until a site inspection was performed and it was determined that the site was unsafe. P believed that there was a contract and D refused to perform. P contracted with other parties and sued D. P won the verdict and D appealed. D contends that the trial court made an error when it allowed testimony from an employee of P as to whether a contract had been formed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.