The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Karpinski (P), an oral surgeon in Cayuga County, wanted to expand his practice. P hired Ingrasci (D), an oral surgeon, to staff his new office. D agreed to never practice dentistry and/or oral surgery in Cayuga, Portland, Seneca, Tompkins, or Ontario Counties except in association with P. D executed a $40,000 promissory note to P to become payable if D left P and practiced dentistry and/or oral surgery in any of the five stated counties. If P terminated D's employment, D was released from the noncompete clause. Either party could terminate the contract with a 60-day notice. The contract expired after three years, and they were unable to reach a new agreement. D opened his own practice that competed with P in the five-county area; 90% of D's patients were referrals. P closed his second office and sued to enforce the note and for an injunction. The trial court gave the verdicts to P. They were overturned on appeal. P appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.