The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P is the former superintendent of D. Ds are the School District and three members of the District's School Board, Carol L. Karl, Jesse Rawls, Sr., and Mark Y. Sussman. P sued Ds seeking redress for her alleged discharge as superintendent, which she asserts violated both federal and state law. P moved for judgment on the pleadings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) on some of the claims set forth in P's third amended complaint because D's responses to some of the allegations in P's pleading were insufficient under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b). P contends that the corresponding allegations should be deemed admitted. And once those allegations are deemed admitted, Plaintiff argues she is entitled to judgment on the pleadings on Counts II, III, IV, VIII, IX, and X of her third amended complaint.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.