Green was insured under a group health plan. That policy was issued by Prudential (D). Green's wife went to Kelly (P) and incurred expenses under the plan. P submitted the bills to D and D refused to pay. P sued both Green and D. The trial court entered a default judgment for P against Green, but P pursued its claim against D on the theory that P was Green's assignee. P had two documents to support that contention both signed by Green. D moved for a summary judgment on the pleadings; the two assignment documents were not delivered to D or were delivered late and that the documents were merely an authorization and not an assignment. The trial court held that an assignment is a transfer, but a transfer is not necessarily an assignment. Under an assignment, the obligee must have intended, at the time of transfer, to dispossess himself of an identified interest or some part thereof and to vest indefeasible title in the transferee (Restatement 2nd Contracts 317(1)). The court granted D's requests, and P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.