Kirkland (P) contracted to make repairs to Archbold's (D) home for a total price of $6,000, to be paid at specified intervals. D would pay P $1,000 after ten days of satisfactory work, $1,000 after twenty days, $1,000 after thirty, and $1,000 upon completion of the job. Another $2,000 was to be paid 30 days after completion. After two months on the job, D discovered that P was plastering the house improperly and told P to stop working. At that time, P had spent $2,985 and had been paid $800. P sued for the difference in a breach of contract action. The trial court found that P was in breach for ignoring contract specifications on the work that was completed. The court held that P was justly fired. Because D has already paid $800, the court reasoned that D had held the first ten days as satisfactory and thus awarded P a judgment for $200. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.