P went outside his home on the morning of June 22, 1966, and found his brand new (1966) Ford Galaxie 500 gone. P’s car had been repossessed by D. P sued D for conversion. P had purchased a new car from a Ford dealership using a purchase mortgage contract that required a down payment and a series of monthly installments. The installment contract showed a time sales price of $4,907.56. P made a down payment of $400.00, tendering to Dealer a personal check in the amount of $300.00 and a second check in the amount of $100.00, the latter being signed in his wife's name. This left a time balance of $4,504.56, to be paid in 36 equal, successive monthly installments of $125.21, the payments to commence on June 26, 1966, under the mortgage contract containing an acceleration and enforcement provisions. Dl shortly became the assignee, on a dealer recourse basis, for the consideration of $3,400.00. Before P's first monthly installment became due, D felt insecure and repossessed the automobile. This was done on June 22, 1966. That was four days before P's first monthly installment was due and at a time when he was not in default. D gave no notice whatsoever of the repossession. The Judge held that acceleration was permissible without notice or demand. But upon acceleration, D then had to make demand or give notice to P so that the admitted failure of notice/demand made D's repossession an unlawful conversion. D had failed to give notice and was held liable for conversion. D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.