P sold D parts for an irrigation system for D's farm, which included a pump for distributing water from a retention pond. P helped design and install the system. The pump was delivered late in the harvest season. D waited until the following spring to install it. P was unwilling to assist in installing the pump because D had not paid for it or its operating panel. D was unwilling to pay for the pump and panel until they were installed. D hired another irrigation specialist to install the pump. D was then advised that the pump would not work with Ds retention pond. D purchased another type of pump that was compatible with its retention pond and irrigation system. P sued D for breach of contract, account stated, and unjust enrichment. D filed a counterclaim, alleging that P had not provided a proper pump for the irrigation system and that P refused to correct the problem. The trial court found that D properly rejected the pump and its panel. The court ordered D to return the goods at its own expense. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.