P's decedent was involved in the movement of a large steel tank by means of a crane with a 60-foot boom. Decedent walked alongside the tank to steady it. A boom came close enough to high-tension lines that electricity from those lines arced over to the boom. Another arc of electricity arced from the tank over to decedent and killed him. D had at one time owned the transmission lines involved. On November 14, 1966, D sold the lines and equipment to Paxton & Vierling. D thereafter sold electricity to Paxton & Vierling and when so requested made repairs upon the lines and equipment. D had no duty to maintain the lines and had not been requested to discontinue the flow of electricity on the date of the accident nor put on notice that a crane was being operated in the vicinity of the lines. As a result, there was no duty owed and the court granted summary judgment to D. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.