P and D were husband and wife and D1, Edward, was D's son. Prior to June 1, 1955, P was the sole owner of the property involved. On that day, P conveyed a parcel of the land to Joseph, Jenny, and Edward jointly and not as tenants in common. Ds denied that they were joint tenants. D also alleged that she was awarded possession of the property by an order of the Family Court and hat P and D were tenants by entirety of an undivided one-half interest and as a tenant by entirety, P cannot maintain his present action for a partition of the real property.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.