Lambert v. California

355 U.S. 225 (1957)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

In Los Angeles, there is an ordinance requiring that a person must report any previous felony convictions to the Chief of Police if he is in the city for more than five days (Code 52.39) or if the person comes into the city five times or more within a 30-day period. The statute makes each day’s failure to register a separate offense. Lambert (D) was arrested on suspicion of another act and was also charged with not registering with the police station. P had been in Los Angeles for more than seven years. During that time, she had been convicted of forgery. D asserted a denial of due process of law. The trial court denied this objection. The case was tried to a jury which found D guilty. The court fined her $250 and placed her on probation for three years. D moved for arrest of judgment and a new trial. This motion was denied. D appealed. The Appellate Department of the Superior Court affirmed the judgment, holding there was no merit to the claim that the ordinance was unconstitutional.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.