H and W were married in 1958 and had two children. They separated in 1971, and five years later, they entered into a separation agreement. The separation agreement was prepared by an attorney related to H by marriage. The attorney represented he was only involved in the agreement because the basic terms had already been agreed upon and that W was free to seek the advice of another attorney. The attorney prepared a draft agreement, and then the final draft was eventually signed. An amendment to the agreement was executed in 1976, and another was done again later that year. W then commenced this action to have the separation agreement and two modifications set aside as inequitable and unconscionable. W alleged that she was not represented by separate counsel and instead without her consent was represented by H's attorney. W alleged that H used coercion and exerted undue influence. W's complaint was dismissed for failure to make out a prima facie case. W appealed. The appeals court reversed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.