This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Roger Lindh (P) proposed marriage to Janis (D) by presenting her with an engagement ring purchased for $17,400. P testified that the price was less than the ring’s market value as he was a good customer of the jeweler. D had never been married, and she accepted the proposal and the ring. Just two months, later the discord that had developed between the two was so intense that P called off the wedding and asked for the ring back. D obliged and gave the ring back. They reconciled and then P again proposed, and she accepted a second time, but in March 1994, P again called off the wedding. D refused to return the ring, and this litigation ensued. Roger (P) sued Janis (D) seeking the ring or its equivalent value. A panel of arbitrators awarded judgment to D and P appealed where a brief nonjury trial resulted in judgment for P for $21,200. D appealed, and the Superior Court affirmed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.