Lipper v. Weslow,
369 S.W.2d 698 (1963)
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Sophie Block, age 81, executed a will 22 days before she died that left her estate to her two surviving children. The will specifically disinherited three of her grandchildren who were descendants of a son who had died some years before. The will had been prepared by her son, Lipper (D), who was a lawyer and stood to benefit from an increased share if the grandchildren were excluded. Sophie died, and the three grandchildren charged D with undue influence. They contended that the disinheritance clause was inserted by D because he never liked his deceased brother. It was shown the D lived next door and had a key and easy access to Sophie and that he stood to gain from the exclusion. There was evidence that D bore malice against his brother and that D wrote the will and it was not read to Sophie before she signed it. A jury found that the will was the result of undue influence. D appealed; there was no factual basis for such a finding.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner