The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

H and W entered a ceremonial marriage in 1965. At the time of the marriage, H, an experienced attorney, knew that W had obtained an Alabama divorce from her previous husband even though she had never lived there. W misrepresented to the court in Alabama that she was a resident although she only spent two days there. The parties cohabitated as husband and wife. They had four children. H contends that in 1974 he first fully became aware of the invalidity of W's prior divorce. The facts show that H talked with W's attorney in the divorce and knew of the entire facts of the situation before H married W. H did commence a divorce action in 1974 but withdrew it after claiming to know the true facts of the first divorce. W and her attorney claim that the action was withdrawn in 1974 because they had reconciled. H then claimed that he told W they were not married, but they could continue to live together. W denied that assertion. In 1981, W instituted a divorce action had H defended on the ground that no valid marriage had existed. The trial court accepted H's version of the events. It found that after 1974, H filed his tax returns as a single head of household. The trial court dismissed the action. This appeal resulted.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.