Lupien v. Malsbenden

477 A.2d 746 (Maine 1984)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

On March 5, 1980, P entered into a written agreement with Gragin, doing business as York Motor Mart (business) for the construction of Bradley automobile. P made two payments ($500 and $3,950) towards the final price of $8,020.00. During P's visits to the shop, he only dealt with D and not Gragin. In April, P was told to sign over ownership of his pick-up truck, which would be used as a consideration for the new car and the proceeds from sale would be used for completion of the Bradley. P was provided with a leased car and later with a demo Bradley car (which later turned out to be someone else's car). P never received the car he purchased. D claimed that his interest was that of a banker; he loaned Gragin $85,000 to finance the business. D acknowledged that Bradley kits were purchased with his personal checks and that he had also purchased equipment for York Motor Mart. He also stated that after Cragin disappeared sometime late in May 1980, he had physical control of the premises of York Motor Mart and that he continued to dispose of assets there even to the time of trial in 1983.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.