This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Luria (P) made a contract with Pielet (D) for D to delivery scrap steel. D did not perform and during trial wanted to enter parol evidence regarding the fact that the written contract was conditioned upon obtaining the scrap steel from a particular supplier. The trial court refused to allow the testimony under parol evidence (UCC 2-202). D appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.