Luria (P) made a contract with Pielet (D) for D to delivery scrap steel. D did not perform and during trial wanted to enter parol evidence regarding the fact that the written contract was conditioned upon obtaining the scrap steel from a particular supplier. The trial court refused to allow the testimony under parol evidence (UCC 2-202). D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.