The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P agreed to thresh all of D’s grain. P performed but refused to thresh the flax. D was unable to procure threshing and sued in a counterclaim for the damages to his flax that remained through the winter. The contract between P and D was the usual one with no special provisions relating to damages. The counterclaim for damages to the flax by D was dismissed, and P recovered for the amounts owing on the threshing bill. D appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.