D is a manufacturer of automobiles. It made new cars from parts it purchased from various suppliers. D neglected to perform safety tests on the car and neglected to inspect the parts of the cars before assembly. It sold an automobile to a retail dealer. The retail dealer resold to P. While P was in the car, it suddenly collapsed, and P was injured. One of the wheels was made of defective wood, and its spokes crumbled into fragments. D bought the wheel from another manufacturer. It was established that the defects could have been discovered by a reasonable inspection, and that inspection was omitted. There was no privity between P and D. Judgment was awarded to P and D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.