P rented premises from D. P fell on a defective stairway. P sued D. During trial the judge found that P was injured by reason of a defect in the stairway owned and controlled by D and that the accident happened on April 18th. Notice to vacate for nonpayment of rent was received by P's husband on April 1st and that on April 14th, D commenced an action for possession of the premises. The judge ruled that P's husband was a tenant at sufferance on the premises. The judge ruled that there was no wanton and willful act by D which caused the injuries to P. The judgment went to D and P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.