D had agreed in writing that, if P should succeed in negotiating a contract with a motion-picture producer whereby D would get the distribution rights for certain motion pictures, D would pay P $ 10,000 on the execution of the contract and a stated percentage of D's gross receipts from distribution of the pictures. P got the rights and D paid the $10,000 but refused to pay any more or to give P an accounting. P sued for an accounting. D made denials and counterclaims. D asserted that P, without the knowledge of D or of the producer, procured the distribution rights by bribing a representative of the producer and that P agreed to pay and did pay to that representative as a bribe the $10,000 which D had paid P. The court held that these defenses were insufficient to defeat P's suit. The court held that since the P-D agreement was not in itself illegal, P's right to be paid for performing it could not be defeated by a showing that he had misconducted himself in carrying it out. The Appellate Division affirmed. D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.