D offers paintball games and allows participants to rent protective equipment. P participated in a paintball match with her husband and friends. P signed a general waiver. The waiver released D from liability from all known or unknown dangers for any reason with the exception of gross negligence on the part of D. The mask was loose and ill-fitting. P attempted to have the mask tightened or replaced on several occasions and an employee attempted to properly fit the mask. While playing P caught the mask on the branch of a tree. The tree was obscured from her field of vision by the top of the mask. The mask was raised off her face because it was loose, and P was struck in the eye, rendering her legally blind in the eye. P sued D for negligence and strict liability based on the failure of the mask to properly be fitted and protect her during play. D asserted the waiver and also P's comparative negligence. The court granted the D's motion, finding the waiver was sufficient to show P expressly assumed the risks associated with playing paintball. The court found her overwhelming comparative fault barred recovery. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.