The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P sustained damage to his New Orleans home as a result of Hurricane Katrina and filed suit to recover `sums alleged due under his insurance contract with D. P has recovered $57,907.62 from D for covered losses (i.e., wind) and $128,000 from flood insurer Allstate for structural damages. P was awarded a $150,000 grant from the Louisiana Recovery Authority ('LRA') to rebuild his home and a $10,000 grant from the U.S. Small Business Association. P argues that the LRA funds constitute a collateral source, and therefore he seeks to have any evidence of LRA funds excluded from evidence so as not to taint the jury.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.