Meyering v. General Motors Corporation

232 Cal.App.3d 1163 (1990)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P was struck on the head by a chunk of concrete thrown from a freeway overpass by two juveniles. P was driving a 1984 Chevrolet Corvette recently purchased by his girlfriend, Jane Casey. The concrete chunk penetrated the car's sunroof. P sued D alleging the Corvette was defectively designed and manufactured and that Ds were negligent in the design, manufacture, and distribution of the automobile. The sunroof was made from a type of plexiglass which was too thin and too weak. He contends there is a relatively inexpensive alternative lexan polycarbonate sheeting which is shatterproof and would have prevented the injury he suffered in this case. D demurred. D claimed its duty did not extend to an unforeseeable intervening act which the manufacturer and seller of the vehicle had no duty to guard against. The court granted the motion. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.