The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D backed his car from his driveway into the street and hit P’s car. P sued D. The case was tried to a jury which found P's damages to be $3,569.70. The jury found no damages for Keith, her husband. The jury determined P's fault to be fifteen percent and D's fault to be eighty-five percent. P claims the verdict is inadequate because her medical expenses nearly totaled the verdict and her medical evidence was uncontroverted. P appealed. P objected to the mitigation of damage instruction claiming the failure to mitigate damages is not fault.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.