Mind & Motion (P) entered into a real estate purchase contract with Celtic Bank (D) that D had acquired from a developer through foreclosure. Although the county had approved plans to construct condominiums on the land, the foreclosed developer had not recorded the plats for the first phase of development. The P-D agreement required d to record the plats by a certain date, and it allowed P sole discretion to extend the recording deadline as necessary. P extended the deadline once, but declined to extend it a second time and sued D for breach of contract. The district court concluded that the recording provision was unambiguously a covenant, not a condition. It then awarded P $100,000 in liquidated damages and more than $200,000 in attorney fees, as well as the return of P's $100,000 earnest money deposit. D appealed. D argues that the contract's recording provision is unambiguously a condition, not a covenant and that the district court, therefore, erred in granting summary judgment.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.