Mohr v. Williams, Sup. Ct. Of Minn.,

95 Minn. 261, 104 N.W.12 (1905)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Mohr (P) was admitted to nonemergency surgery for her right ear after an examination by Williams (D), an ear specialist. After D began the operation on P's right ear, he concluded that the right ear was not serious enough to warrant an operation, but he found that the left ear would require an operation. The condition in the left ear was not life-threatening, but it needed surgery. D operated on the left ear without reviving P to ask her permission. The operation was successful. P sued for battery. The trial in the court below resulted in a verdict to P for $14,322.50. A new trial was granted on the grounds that the damages were excessive. D's motion for a judgment n.o.v. was not granted. Both parties appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.