This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Molien (P) and his wife were members of Kaiser Health Care Plan. P's wife received a physical examination from Kaiser (D). The doctor negligently diagnosed her as having syphilis. The doctor also told P's wife to have P tested. P got the test, and the results showed that he did not have syphilis. However, because of the wrong diagnosis, his wife accused P of having an affair. This problem led to hostility, 'causing a break-up of their marriage and the initiation of dissolution proceedings.' P sued D, claiming that he suffered emotional distress form the breakup of the marriage and that this break-up was caused by D's negligence. P claimed that D knew or should have known their diagnosis that P's wife had syphilis and that he might also have the disease would cause him emotional distress. P alleged that he has suffered 'extreme emotional distress' as a result of the negligent misdiagnosis. Additionally, he has incurred medical expenses for counseling in an effort to save the marriage. In his second cause of action, P alleged that as a consequence of defendants' acts plaintiff has been deprived of the 'love, companionship, affection, society, sexual relations, solace, support, and services' of his wife. The trial court sustained D's demurrer. It stated that P could not recover for negligent infliction of emotional harm if he himself did not suffer any physical injury. P appealed

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.