This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P purchased a steel grain tank from D for use in a feed processing plant. Ten years later, a crack was discovered in the tank on one of the steel plates. P sued under strict tort liability, misrepresentation, negligent design, and express warranty. A circuit court held that P could not recover from D under the theories of (1) strict liability in tort, (2) misrepresentation and (3) negligence for purely economic losses resulting from an alleged crack in a grain-storage tank. The circuit court dismissed counts I, II and III of plaintiff's complaint (based upon the above tort theories) but found that count IV, based upon breach of express warranty, was not barred by the statute of limitations. The appellate court held that P could recover for economic loss under the tort theories of strict liability, misrepresentation, and negligence. The court also found that plaintiff's tort actions were not barred by the statute of limitations and that the storage tank was a product. It reversed the trial court's dismissal of counts I, II and III. D appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.