Motel Services, Inc. v. Central Maine Power Co.

394 A.2d 786 (1978)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Motel Services (P) agreed with the Waterville Housing Authority to build two housing projects on a turnkey basis. Initially, the plans called for oil heating, but P got real smart and found out that Central Maine Power Co. (D) was offering a promotional allowance to install electric heating. P then persuaded Waterville and HUD to consent to modifications and even offered a price reduction of $16,000. P did not tell them that he was getting a promotional allowance from D. After the electrical system was installed and before all the Standards required by D had been complied with, P conveyed the property to Waterville to avoid tax consequences. The projects were completed and eventually met all of D's standards. D completed the paperwork and inspection from D and D then, not knowing of the situation, sent the forms and allowance to Waterville. P sued D claiming it was entitled to the allowance. Judgment was for D and P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.