Murray v. Conseco, Inc.

795 N.E.2d 454 (2003)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D is an Indiana corporation whose articles of incorporation have no provisions regarding removal of directors. P was elected to the Board by the shareholders as a whole, and not by a separate “voting group.” D's directors are elected by vote of the shareholders to staggered three-year terms. All common share and voting preferred shares vote together to elect directors. P was first elected to a three-year term. He was re-elected in 1997 and again in June 2000. On December 12, 2000, D's Board of Directors voted to remove P as a director. P filed a declaratory judgment action challenging his removal as a violation of the Indiana Business Corporation Law (BCL) as only the shareholders could remove him. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of D and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.