Neu v. Grant
548 F.2d 281 (1977)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P was a guest passenger in a 1967 Plymouth Fury owned by Grants (D) and operated by Lorna Grant and a pickup truck owned and operated by Frank Grant was traveling in the same direction. Ds engaged in a speed contest between the two vehicles. Lorna lost control of the Plymouth. It skidded sideways for a long distance, rolled over at least one complete revolution and came to rest on its wheels off of the roadway. P alleged that the accident was caused by the negligence of Frank and the gross negligence of Lorna. The jury was instructed that P was a guest in the Plymouth Fury and that, pursuant to the guest statute, P had the burden to prove that Lorna was grossly negligent. Following a pre-trial conference, P filed a Motion to Strike D's Answer, which alleged that the Wyoming Guest Statute barred recovery, in that the statute was unconstitutional. The motion was denied, but P did not object. Nor did P object to the instruction given to the jury. After the verdict, P did not respond with any motions. P then appealed on the grounds that the statute was unconstitutional under state and federal law.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner