Nycal Corporation v. Kpmg Peat Marwick Llp,

688 N.E. 2d 1368 (1998)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P was interested in taking a position in Gulf. Gulf provided P with a copy of its 1990 annual report that was prepared by D. Gulf was a public company. P relied on D's report of the financial condition of Gulf and as such then entered into a stock purchase agreement with the controlling shareholders of Gulf. The sale was completed, and less than two years later Gulf declared bankruptcy rendering P's investment worthless. D first learned of the P-Gulf transaction a few days prior to the July 12, 1991 closing. Until that time, D had no knowledge of what had been agreed upon or even contemplated. P sued D seeking damages and costs incurred as a result of its alleged reliance on D's audit report. P claimed that the report materially misrepresented the financial condition of Gulf. The trial judge applied the liability standard under 552 Restatement of Torts and granted summary judgment to D. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.