Odorizzi (P) was a teacher under contract to teach elementary school with Bloomfield (D). P was arrested for homosexual activities and resigned the next day. In July, the criminal charges were dismissed, and D refused to reinstate P. P alleged that the resignation was invalid because it was obtained by fraud, duress, mistake, and undue influence and given at a time when he lacked capacity to make a valid contract. P claimed that immediately after his arrest, the superintendent of D and the principal of the school had come immediately to his apartment and told him that if he did not resign immediately, D would suspend him and publicize the proceedings and if he did resign they would not publicize the incident or jeopardize his employment chances elsewhere. D claimed that they were trying to help P and had his best interests at heart. They also said that there was no time to consult an attorney P claimed that D overcame his free will and substituted theirs in its place. D demurred to the complaint. The trial court dismissed the complaint because the alleged facts were insufficient to state a cause of action. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.