Ophthalmic Surgeons, Ltd. v. Paychex, Inc.

632 F.3d 31 (1st Cir. 2011)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P sought to find a better way to administer its payroll. P entered into an oral contract with D for payroll processing services. In 1994, they entered into a written contract. D was to provide direct deposit payroll services. D alleges that it performs its payroll processing services based on the information its clients provide. Each new client, through its designated payroll contact, provides D with the relevant employee information, including names, addresses, social security numbers, and salary information. D submits reports and other documents to its clients on a regular basis. These reports include payroll journals and checks, which are sent to the client prior to the date the checks will be paid to the employees. D provides quarterly reports, yearly reports, and W-2 earnings statements to all clients. In 1984, Carleen Connor worked for P as a technician who earned $7.00 per hour. She later became a licensed optician and the office manager, at which point she earned $16.00 per hour. It is undisputed that, from the mid-1990s until her termination in 2006, Connor handled payroll for P and was its office manager and designated payroll contact. D contacted Connor regularly to inquire about P's payroll. P was aware, Connor would often call in more than one week's worth of payroll at a time. In 2001, Connor began requesting that D direct deposit more money than required to pay her annual salary. D did not contact anyone at P to verify Connor's request for more money or split payments. D paid her a total of $233,159 more than her authorized annual salary. D sent to P reports confirming all payments made. These reports were sent to Connor's attention. P discovered the unauthorized payments when another employee took over Connor's duties. P sued D for breach of contract. D filed a motion for summary judgment, which the court issued. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.