Osterlind v. Hill

160 N.E. 301 (1928)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

D was engaged in the business of letting for hire pleasure boats and canoes to be used on Lake Quannapowitt. P rented a canoe to Intestate (P) and Ryan who were alleged to be intoxicated, and manifestly unfit to go upon the lake in the canoe. It overturned and the intestate after hanging to it for approximately one half hour, and making loud calls for assistance, which calls D heard and utterly ignored, was obliged to release his hold, and was drowned. P sued D, and the trial court sustained demurrers to both the original and amended declarations. P appealed.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.