D contracted to install nine roofs for P. Some of the contracts involved the installation of U.S. Intec materials and included U.S. Intec's 10-year material warranty. One involved the installation of a Firestone membrane and included the manufacturer's 10-year labor and material warranty. P discovered that neither U.S. Intec nor Firestone had a record of any warranties issued for its roofs. P sued D, claiming that the construction was defective and that they had not received manufacturers' warranties for the materials. D responded by issuing P backdated U.S. Intec warranties. The company further provided its own 10-year labor and material warranty as a substitute for the Firestone warranty and agreed to complete some items that had not been performed in accordance with the contracts' specifications. The trial court awarded P $28,612 in damages. The award included a portion of the cost to replace the roofs, prorated to reflect the existing roofs' performance prior to the suit, and incidental and consequential losses. D challenges the trial court's decision to award damages based on the cost of replacing the roofs.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.