Pursuant to a written contract, Ds agreed to purchase and P, an Arizona licensed contractor, agreed to install vinyl siding on Ds' home for $5,475. The contract provided that Ds could cancel the transaction within three business days. Ds never did so. P installed the siding approximately one week after the contract was executed. Ds refused to pay. P sued them for breach of contract and later added claims for quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. The trial court dismissed P's contract claim, concluding that the parties' transaction constituted a 'home solicitation sale' within the meaning of § 44-5001(1) and that the parties' contract was 'ineffective' because it lacked language required by § 44-5004(B). It then ruled that P was entitled to recover the reasonable value of the improvements (siding and installation) in the amount of $5,475 based on unjust enrichment. The court entered judgment for $7,800 in attorney's fees plus taxable costs. Ds appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.