The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Mrs. Harriss wrote to D stating that she intended to dispose of her stock and leases and that before disposition, she would sell to D at a substantial discount. That offer was refused by D. Mr. Harriss then formed P, and then Mrs. Harris then sold P her 777 shares of stock and all rights in three property leases. D refused to recognize the transfer of stock and refused to accept checks tendered in payment of monthly assessments. D asserted that Mrs. Harriss failed to comply with the restrictions on the sale of the stock referred to in the endorsement on the stock certificate. P and Mrs. Harriss contend that these restrictions are invalid and unenforceable as a restraint on alienation.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.