Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.

430 U.S. 1 (1977)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Chris-Craft (P) began making cash purchases of D common stock. P publicly announced a cash tender offer. D decided to oppose P's tender offer. D entered into an agreement with Grumman Aircraft Corp., but even so, P acquired 304,606 shares by the time its cash tender offer expired on February 3. To obtain the additional 17% of D stock needed for control, P decided to make an exchange offer of P securities for D stock. P made cash purchases and was expressly warned by SEC officials that such purchases, when made during the pendency of an exchange offer, violated SEC Rule 10b-6. P then canceled all outstanding orders for purchases of D stock. D then terminated the agreement with Grumman and entered into negotiations with Bangor Punta. The Piper family agreed on May 8, 1969, to exchange their 31% stockholdings in Piper for Bangor Punta securities. Bangor also agreed to use its best efforts to achieve control of D by means of an exchange offer of Bangor securities for D common stock. Bangor then purchased 120,200 shares of D stock in privately negotiated, off-exchange transactions from three large institutional investors. Eventually, D won out as P only had 42% of D stock. P sued, alleging that Bangor's block purchases of 120,200 Piper shares in mid-May violated Rule 10b-6 and that Bangor's May 8 press release, announcing an $ 80 valuation of Bangor securities to be offered in the forthcoming exchange offer, violated SEC 'gun-jumping' provisions. P sought to enjoin Bangor from voting the D shares purchased in violation of Rule 10b-6 and from accepting any shares tendered by D stockholders pursuant to the exchange offer. Eventually, the court of appeals held that P had standing under § 14(e) of the Williams Act. The district court awarded damages, and the court of appeals reversed the damage award, setting damages much higher. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.