This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Pirus (P)s filed suit on behalf of herself and a class of similarly situated individuals, challenging D's decision to deny benefits to spouses whose remarriages predated their former spouses' deaths. The court granted summary judgment to the class. The district court also granted P's petition for attorney's fees under the EAJA, awarding fees above the statutory cap of $75 per hour. D appealed the attorney fees. The court reasoned that P's attorneys were expert in the field of social security law. The court also found that there were no lawyers in the community willing to undertake the case at the statutory rate. Finally, the court noted that P's lawyers were uniquely situated to handle her case because of their recent experience litigating a similar case, Bowen v. Owens, all the way to the Supreme Court.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.